Who Should Be Responsible For the Australia Fire? (3)

Should Environmental Activists be Responsible for the Australia Fires?

--Topwristband.com Edit 

Pic. From Google

    Truth 3: The arguing between the commercial logging and the Forest management

    On the basis of the fact, there are some natural mountain fire happening in the forests of Australia. Even though people do nothing to stop it, it would fight the fire by itself. But how would it extend to a such large range? Because the forests have been changed totally. The commercial logging makes the forest into piece and piece. The man-made forests, which would be burnt easily, surround the original forest. And the climate changing has benefit to the fire extending. Therefore, there are a lot of elements benefit to the fire extending, which are created by human’s behavior. Thus, the environmental protection organizations and the scientists are supporting to arrange the forests.

    On the basis of the sustainable development of forests, they only permit the hewers logging the withered trees. This kind of tree haven’t the valuable wood, they are meaningless to the forestry industry. What’s more, the value of these trees is lower than the cost of cutting them. Thus, the commercial logging is always against to the environmental protection organizations.

Pic. From Google

    Truth 4: The fires lead by the climate

    Of course, this fires extend to such large range, it is not only about the combustible material. The combustible material is changing into the second reason. In Australia, there is an index called FFDI. This index would show the influence of the rainfall capacity, the temperature, the humidity and the wind power, etc. When the value of FFDI is over 50, no matter the material is flammable or not, the fires would keep extending because of the climate.